首页/文章/ 详情

襟翼式前置定子节能机理分析及优化-船研所

5月前浏览214


航运安全与技术国家重点实验室

航运技术交通行业重点实验室

杨帆

襟翼式前置定子几何形状

前置定子是安装在螺旋桨前方的节能装置,其主要目的是通过改善船尾伴流场、产生预旋流来提高船舶推进效率。

image.pngimage.png

PSS节能机理分析

image.png


  • 能量分析介绍


船舶在航行时螺旋桨吸收主机功率推船前进,但是螺旋桨吸收的功率并不能全部用于克服船舶阻力,有相当一部分能量损失在螺旋桨的尾流中。节能装置的作用就是减小尾流中的能量损失,提高推进效率,以达到节能的作用。因此用能量的观点来分析船尾流场能够简洁明了地展示节能装置的节能机理。

image.png

首先定义在尾流中单位时间内通过某截面Sw处的轴向动能Eax和横向动能Etr。


image.png

注意:

1、当Ktotal=0时,说明尾流中没有能量损失。

2、当Ktotal>0时,说明推进系统的能量有一部分浪费在了尾流中。

3、Ktotal值越大说明尾流中的能量损失就越多。


本文选取了截面A、截面B以及桨盘面来监测船尾流体能量的变化。这三个截面是以桨轴中心线为基准的圆面,其直径为螺旋桨直径的1.3倍。

image.png

  • 无桨时前置定子对流场的影响

桨盘面处轴向伴流等值图(计算值)

image.png(a)不带前置定子                                                    

image.png (b)带前置定子桨盘面处轴向伴流等值图(计算值)


  • 有桨时前置定子对流场的影响

无节能装置时的横向速度矢量图                            前置定子时横向速度矢量图

image.png

image.png

为了更好的阐明前置定子对桨前流体的影响,本节给出了在前置定子区域不同剖面的切向速度矢量图。

image.png

image.png

image.png

  • 前置定子的作用区域( 半径 )

船尾部以桨轴为中心,不同半径区域流体的流态各不相同。

15b3dec2-519b-4503-b9fd-3de87eb4a45a.png

                                  (a)横向动能大小                                                           (b)横向动能强度

有桨无节能装置时的截面B不同半径之间的横向动能及能量强度分布

注:横向动能强度是指单位面积上所含有的横向动能。

因此,在设计之初重点考虑了该前置定子对0.8R半径区域以内流体旋转运动的影响力。通过控制襟翼在不同半径处的弦长,使得越靠近桨轴前置定子对流体旋转运动的影响程度越大。

image.png

有桨作用时船尾截面A不同半径之间的横向动能强度

image.png

该前置定子对桨前以 0.6R为半径的区域内的流体影响比较大,具有明显的预旋作用。

image.png

前置定子的预旋作用使得桨后以0.8R为半径的区域内流体的横向动能明显减少,尤其是在0.6R半径区域内。


前置定子水动力性能优化

为了进一步了解前置定子的各个形状参数对其水动力性能的影响,本文将采用数值评估的方法对影响该前置定子节能效果的参数进行分析。影响该前置定子节能效果的参数主要包括襟翼角度、襟翼面积、襟翼长度、导叶半径等。

image.pngimage.png


导叶、襟翼的示意图                                           前置定子叶片的横剖面图

  • 襟翼角度



襟翼的角度对前置定子的节能效果有很大影响。襟翼角度大,其对流体的预旋也大,襟翼角度小,其对流场的影响也较弱。产生的预旋过大时,螺旋桨很难将这部分能量完全吸收,这就造成了能量的浪费,减弱了前置定子的节能效果。但是如果产生的预旋过小,螺旋桨产生的横向动能又不能被很好的中和,前置定子的节能效果并没有完全体现出来。因此,襟翼的角度与船体、螺旋桨之间存在一个最佳配合。

image.png

  • 襟翼面积

原方案为本文的原型前置定子,方案一、方案二在原型的基础上保持翼型弦长不变,通过提高襟翼长度占总长度的比例来增加襟翼面积。

方案三是在原型的基础上保持形状不变,通过增加襟翼长度来增加襟翼面积。方案一和方案三的襟翼面积是一样的,只是增加面积的方法不一样。

image.png

image.png

image.png

  • 襟翼长度

本节对具有不同襟翼长度的前置定子节能效果进行了比较计算。图为不同方案的襟翼长度。模型尺度下,原始方案的襟翼长度为5.93mm、方案一的襟翼长度为7.47mm、方案二的襟翼长度为8.72mm。

image.png

image.png

通过比较可以看出,虽然增加襟翼的长度 有助于提高该型前置 定子的节能效果,但 是襟翼的长度并不是 越长越好。因此,襟 翼的长度存在一个最 佳值使得前置定子的 节能效果最佳。

  • 导叶长度

image.png

image.png


免责声明:


本页面/内容部分素材来源于互联网公 开 信 息,旨在传递更多信息,不代表本平台立场。

版权归原作者或机构所有,如涉及侵权,请通过平台联系我们,我们将在核实后第一时间处理。

本平台对转载内容的真实性、准确性不作任何保证,用户需自行判断并承担使用风险。

Star-CCM+船舶
著作权归作者所有,欢迎分享,未经许可,不得转载
首次发布时间:2026-04-30
最近编辑:5月前
仿真支持爱好者
在仿真的路上越走越远
获赞 333粉丝 27文章 318课程 0
点赞
收藏
作者推荐

嵌入式实时操作系统:DSP 微内核设计与实现电子书 212页

嵌入式实时操作系统:DSP 微内核设计与实现(DSP_Realtime_Operating_Systems_for_Embedded_Systems)电子书摘要:本书是嵌入式 DSP 实时操作系统微内核设计与实现的专业指南,围绕嵌入式实时操作系统内核开发展开系统讲解。先明确嵌入式系统对内存、性能、可移植性的核心需求,再阐述抢占式多任务、任务控制块、信号量、环形缓冲队列等核心概念与原理。书中完整呈现内核架构、硬件适配、任务切换、中断处理、进程通信、串口 I/O、内存管理的代码实现,覆盖系统启动、任务创建 / 调度 / 销毁全流程,提供基于 MC68000 系列处理器的工程实例与调试监控工具,还详解跨平台开发环境搭建与移植方法,为嵌入式 DSP 实时内核开发提供全栈技术参考。Realtime Operating SystemsConcepts and Implementation of Microkernels for Embedded SystemsDr. Jürgen Sauermann, Melanie ThelenPrefaceEvery year, millions of microprocessor and microcontroller chips are sold as CPUs for general purpose computers, such as PCs or workstations, but also for devices that are not primarily used as computers, such as printers, TV sets, SCSI controllers, cameras, and even coffee machines. Such devices are commonly called embedded systems. Surprisingly, the number of chips used for embedded systems exceeds by far the number of chips used for general purpose computers.Both general purpose computers and embedded systems (except for the very simple ones) require an operating system. Most general purpose computers (except mainframes) use either UNIX, Windows, or DOS. For these operating systems, literature abounds. In contrast, literature on operating systems of embedded systems is scarce, although many different operating systems for embedded systems are available. One reason for this great variety of operating systems might be that writing an operating system is quite a challenge for a system designer. But what is more, individually designed systems can be extended in exactly the way required, and the developer does not depend on a commercial microkernel and its flaws.The microkernel presented in this book may not be any better than others, but at least you will get to know how it works and how you can modify it. Apart from that, this microkernel has been used in practice, so it has reached a certain level of maturity and stability. You will learn about the basic ideas behind this microkernel, and you are provided with the complete source code that you can use for your own extensions.The work on this microkernel was started in summer 1995 to study the efficiency of an embedded system that was mainly implemented in C++. Sometimes C++ is said to be less efficient than C and thus less suitable for embedded systems. This may be true when using a particular C++ compiler or programming style, but has not been confirmed by the experiences with the microkernel provided in this book. In 1995, there was no hardware platform available to the author on which the microkernel could be tested. So instead, the microkernel was executed on a simulated MC68020 processor. This simulation turned out to be more useful for the development than real hardware, since it provided more information about the execution profile of the code than hardware could have done. By mere coincidence, the author joined a project dealing with automated testing of telecommunication systems. In that project, originally a V25 microcontroller had been used, running a cooperative multitasking operating system. At that time, the system had already reached its limits, and the operating system had shown some serious flaws. It became apparent that at least the operating system called for major redesign, and chances were good that the performance of the microcontroller would be the next bottleneck. These problems had already caused serious project delay, and the most promising solution was to replace the old operating system by the new microkernel, and to design a new hardware based on a MC68020 processor. The new hardware was ready in summer 1996, and the port from the simulation to the real hardware took less than three days. In the two months that followed, the applications were ported from the old operating system to the new microkernel. This port brought along a dramatic simplification of the application as well as a corresponding reduction in source code size. This reduction was possible because serial I/O and interprocess communication were now provided by the microkernel rather than being part of the applications.Although the microkernel was not designed with any particular application in mind, it perfectly met the requirements of the project. This is neither by accident nor by particular ingenuity of the author. It is mainly due to a good example: the MIRAGE operating system written by William Dowling of Sahara Software Ltd. about twenty years ago. That operating system was entirely written in assembler and famous for its real-time performance. Many concepts of the microkernel presented in this book have been adopted from the MIRAGE operating system.1 Requirements1.1 General RequirementsProper software design starts with an alyzing the requirements that have to be fulfilled by the design. For embedded systems, the requirements are defined by the purpose of the system. General definitions of the requirements are not possible: for example, the requirements of a printer will definitely be different from those of a mobile phone. There are, however, a few common requirements for embedded systems which are described in the following sections.1.2 Memory RequirementsThe first PCs ofthe early eighties had 40 kilobytes ofROM, 256 or 512 kilobytes of RAM, and optionally a hard disk drive with 5 or 10 megabytes capacity. In the mid-nineties, an off-the-shelf PC had slightly more ROM, 32 megabytes of RAM, and a hard disk drive of 2 or 4 gigabytes capacity. Floppy disks with 360 or 720 kilobyte capacity, which were the standard medium for software packages and backups, had been replaced by CD-ROM and tape streamers with capacities well above 500 megabytes. Obviously, capacity has doubled about every two years, and there is no indication that this trend will change. So why bother about memory requirements?A PC is an open system that can be extended both in terms of memory and peripherals. For a short while, a PC can be kept up to date with technological developments by adding more memory and peripherals until it is ultimately outdated. Anyway, a PC could live for decades; but its actual lifetime is often determined by the increasing memory demands of operating systems and applications rather than by the lifetime of its hardware. So to extend the lifetime of a PC as much as possible and thus to reduce the costs, its configuration has to be planned thoroughly.For a given embedded system, in contrast, the memory requirements are known in advance; so costs can be saved by using only as much memory as required. Unlike PCs, where the ROM is only used for booting the system, ROM size plays a major role for the memory requirements of embedded systems, because in embedded systems, the ROM is used as program memory. For the ROM, various types of memory are available, and their prices differ dramatically: EEPROMs are most expensive, followed by static RAMs, EPROMs, dynamic RAMs, hard disks,floppy disks, CD-ROMs, and tapes. The most economical solution for embedded systems is to combine hard disks (which provide non-volatility) and dynamic RAMs (which provide fast access times).Generally, the memory technology used for an embedded system is determined by the actual application: For example, for a laser printer, the RAM will be dynamic, and the program memory will be either EEPROM, EPROM, or RAM loaded from a hard disk. For a mobile phone, EEPROMs and static RAMs will rather be used.One technology which is particularly interesting for embedded systems is on-chip memory. Comparatively large on-chip ROMs have been available for years, but their lack of flexibility limited their use to systems produced in large quantities. The next generation of microcontrollers were on-chip EPROMs, which were suitable also for s maller quantities. Recent microcontrollers provide on-chip EEPROM and static RAM. The Motorola 68HC9xx series, for example, offers on-chip EEPROM of 32 to 100 kilobytes and static RAM of 1 to 4 kilobytes.With the comeback of the Z80 microprocessor, another interesting solution has become available. Although it is over two decades old, this chip seems to outperform its successors. The structure of the Z80 is so simple that it can be integrated in FPGAs (Field Programmable Logic Arrays). With this technique, entire microcontrollers can be designed to fit on one chip, providing exactly the functions required by an application. Like several other microcontrollers, the Z80 provides a total memory space of 64 kilobytes.Although the memory size provided on chips will probably increase in the future, the capacities available today suggest that an operating system for embedded system should be less than 32 kilobytes in size, leaving enough space for the application.1.3 PerformanceThe increase in the PCs’ memory size is accompanied by a similar increase in performance. The first PCs had an 8 bit 8088 CPU running at 8 MHz, while today a 32 bit CPU running at 200 MHz is recommended. So CPU performance has doubled about every two years, too. Surprisingly, this dramatic increase in performance is not perceived by the user: today’s operating systems consume even more memory and CPU performance than technological development can provide. So the more advanced the operating system, the slower the applications. One reason for the decreasing performance of applications and also of big operating systems might be that re-use of code has become common practice; coding as such is avoided as much as possible. And since more and more code is executed in interfaces between existing modules, rather than used for the actual problem, performance steadily deteriorates.Typically, performance demands of embedded systems are higher than those of general purpose computers. Of course, if a PC or embedded system is too slow, you could use a faster CPU. This is a good option for PCs, where CPU costs are only a minor part of the total costs. For embedded systems, however, the cost increase would be enormous. So the performance of the operating system has significant impact on the costs of embedded systems, especially for single-chip systems.For example, assume an embedded system requiring serial communication at a speed of 38,400 Baud. In 1991, a manufacturer of operating systems located in Redmond, WA, writes in his C/C++ Version 7.0 run-time library reference: “The _bios_serialcom routine may not be able to establish reliable communications at baud rates in excess of 1,200 Baud (_COM_ 1200) due to the overhead associated with servicing computer interrupts”. Although this statement assumes a slow 8 bit PC running at 8 MHz, no PC would have been able to deal with 38,400 baud at that time. In contrast, embedded systems had been able to manage that speed already a decade earlier: using 8 bit CPUs at even lower clock frequencies than the PCs’.Performance is not only determined by the operating system, but also by power consumption. Power consumption becomes particularly important if an embedded system is operated from a battery, for example a mobile phone. For today’s commonly used CMOS semiconductor technology, the static power required is virtually zero, and the power actually consumed by a circuit is proportional to the frequency at which the circuit is operated. So if the performance of the operating system is poor, the CPU needs to be operated at higher frequencies, thus consuming more power. Consequently, the system needs larger batteries, or the time the system can be operated with a single battery charge is reduced. For mobile phones, where a weight of 140g including batteries and stand-by times of 80 hours are state ofthe art, both of these consequences would be show stoppers for the product. Also for other devices, power consumption is critical; and last, but not least, power consumption should be considered carefully for any electrical device for the sake of our environment.1.4 PortabilityAs time goes by, the demands on products are steadily increasing. A disk controller that was the fastest on the market yesterday will be slow tomorrow. Mainstream CPUs have a much wider performance range than the different microcontroller families available on the market. Thus eventually it will be necessary to change to a different family. At this point, commercial microkernels can be a problem if they support only a limited number of microcontrollers, or not the one that would otherwise perfectly meet the specific requirements for a product. In any case, portability should be considered from the outset.The obvious approach for achieving portability is to use high level languages, in particular C or C++. In principle, portability for embedded system is easier to achieve than for general purpose computers. The reason is that complex applications for general purpose computers not only depend on the CPU used, but also on the underlying operating system, the window system used, and the configuration of the system.A very s mall part of the microkernel presented in this book was written in Assembler; the rest was written in C++. The part of the kernel which depends on the CPU type and which needs to be ported when a different CPU family is used, is the Assembler part and consists of about 200 Assembler instructions. An experienced programmer, familiar with both the microkernel and the target CPU, will be able to port it in less than a week.The entire kernel, plus a simple application, fit in less than 16 kilobyte ROM for a MC68020 CPU. Hence it is especially suitable for single chip solutions.2 Concepts2.1 Specification and Execution of ProgramsThe following sections describe the structure of a program, how a program is prepared for execution, and how the actual execution of the program works.2.1.1 Compiling and LinkingLet us start with a variant of the well known “Hello World!” program:#include <stdio.h>const char * Text = "Hello World\n";char Data [] = "Hello Data\n";int Uninitialized; // Bad Practiceint main(int argc, char * argv []){printf(Text);}This C++ program prints “Hello World”, followed by a line feed on the screen of a computer when it is executed. Before it can be executed, however, it has to be transformed into a format that is executable by the computer. This transformation is done in two steps: compilation and linking.The first step, compilation, is performed by a program called compiler. The compiler takes the program text shown above from one file, for example Hello.cc, and produces another file, for example Hello.o. The command to compile a file is typically something likeg++ -o Hello.o Hello.ccThe name of the C++ compiler, g++ in our case, may vary from computer to computer. The Hello.o file, also referred to as objectfile, mainly consists of three sections: TEXT, DATA, and BSS. The so-called include file stdio.h is simply copied into Hello.cc in an early execution phase of the compiler, known as preprocessing. The purpose of stdio.h is to tell the compiler that printf is not a spelling mistake, but the name of a function that is defined elsewhere. We can imagine the generation of Hello.o as shown in Figure 2.1.1Several object files can be collected in one single file, a so-called library. An important library is libc.a (the name may vary with the operating system used): it contains the code for the printf function used in our example, and also for other functions. We can imagine the generation of libc.a as shown in Figure 2.2.1. Note: The BSS section contains space for symbols that uninitialized when starting the program. For example, the integer variable Uninitialized will be included here in order to speed up the loading of the program. However, this is bad programming practice, and the bad style is not weighed up by the gain in speed. Apart from that, the memory of embedded systems is rather s mall, and thus loading does not take long anyway. Moreover, we will initialize the complete data memory for security reasons; so eventually, there is no speed advantage at all. Therefore, we assume that the BSS section is always empty, which is why it is not shown in Figure 2.1, and why it will not be considered further on.The second step of transforming program text into an executable program is linking. A typical link command is e.g.ld -o Hello Hello.oWith the linking process, which is illustrated in Figure 2.3, all unresolved references are resolved. In our example, printfis such an unresolved reference, as it is used in main(), but defined in printf.o, which in turn is contained in libc.a. The linking process combines the TEXT and DATA sections of different object files in one single object file, consisting of one TEXT and one DTA section only. If an object file is linked against a library, only those object files containing definitions for unresolved symbols are used. It should be noted that a linker can produce different file formats. For our purposes, the so-called Motorola S-record format will be used.2.2 Loading and Execution of ProgramsAfter a program has been compiled and linked, it can be executed. While compilation and linking is basically identical for embedded systems and general purpose computers, there are some differences regarding the execution of programs. Table 2.1 lists the steps performed during program execution and shows the differences between general purpose computers and embedded systems:Obviously, the execution of a program in an embedded system is much easier than in a general purpose computer.更多内容见附件免责声明:本页面/内容部分素材来源于互联网公 开 信 息,旨在传递更多信息,不代表本平台立场。版权归原作者或机构所有,如涉及侵权,请通过平台联系我们,我们将在核实后第一时间处理。本平台对转载内容的真实性、准确性不作任何保证,用户需自行判断并承担使用风险。

有附件
未登录
还没有评论
课程
培训
服务
行家
VIP会员 学习计划 福利任务
下载APP
联系我们
帮助与反馈