本文摘要(由AI生成):
本文综述了数字孪生技术在交通领域的应用研究。包括船舶交通服务系统、高速公路交通数字孪生系统、城市交通数字孪生、地方道路数字孪生开发过程、自动驾驶安全性能评估、小间距主干道交通组织、基于数字孪生的脑图像融合、无人机数字孪生、以及数字孪生技术的更多应用。这些研究展示了数字孪生技术在交通领域的广泛应用前景和潜力。
作者:吕志涵、谢淑轩(音译)
摘要
随着数字化进程的推进,大数据、人工智能(AI)、云计算、数字孪生、边缘计算等先进的计算机技术已应用于各个领域。为研究数字孪生与AI结合的应用现状,本文通过研究当前已发表文献的研究成果,对AI在数字孪生中的应用和前景进行了分类。本文从航空航天、生产车间智能制造、无人驾驶汽车、智慧城市交通四大领域探讨了数字孪生体的应用现状,并回顾了当前面临的挑战和未来需要期待的话题。
研究发现,数字孪生与AI的融合在航空航天飞行探测仿真、故障预警、飞机组装甚至无人飞行方面具有显著效果。在汽车自动驾驶的虚拟仿真测试中,可以节省80%的时间和成本,相同的路况降低了实际车辆动力学模型的参数尺度,大大提高了测试精度。在生产车间的智能制造中,建立虚拟工作场所环境可以提供及时的故障预警,延长设备的使用寿命,确保车间整体运行安全。在智慧城市交通中,模拟真实的道路环境,恢复交通事故,使交通状况清晰高效,快速准确地进行城市交通管理。最后,我们展望了数字孪生和人工智能的未来,希望为未来相关领域的研究提供参考。
介绍
数字孪生在
汽车自动驾驶领域面临的挑战
航空航天领域
数字孪生面临的挑战
数字孪生在
智能制造领域面临的挑战
智慧城市交通领域面临的挑战
汽车自动驾驶领域的未来展望
航空航天领域
数字孪生的未来研究课题
数字孪生在
智能制造方向的未来展望
城市智能交通中
数字孪生的未来研究课题
参考书目
1. Rasheed A, San O, Kvamsdal T: Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. Ieee Access. 2020; 8: 21980–22012. Publisher Full Text
2. Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, et al.: Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE access. 2020; 8: 108952–108971. Publisher Full Text
3. Khajavi SH, Motlagh NH, Jaribion A, et al.: Digital twin: vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE access. 2019; 7: 147406–147419. Publisher Full Text
4. Madni AM, Madni CC, Lucero SD: Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems. 2019; 7(1): 7. Publisher Full Text
5. Vaishya R, Javaid M, Khan IH, et al.: Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020; 14(4): 337–339. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
6. Gunning D, Aha D: DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine. 2019; 40(2): 44–58. Publisher Full Text
7. Haenlein M, Kaplan A: A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manage Rev 2019; 61(4): 5–14. Publisher Full Text
8. Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, et al.: Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. Ieee T Ind Inform. 2018; 15(4): 2405–2415. Publisher Full Text
9. Collins GS, Moons KG: Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. Lancet. 2019; 393(10181): 1577–1579. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. Bullock JA, Luccioni A, Luengo-Oroz M, et al.: Mapping the landscape of artificial intelligence applications against COVID-19. J Artif Intell Res. 2020; 69: 807–845. Publisher Full Text
11. Calo R: Artificial Intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UCDL Rev. 2017; 51: 399. Publisher Full Text
12. Alexopoulos K, Nikolakis N, Chryssolouris G: Digital twin-driven supervised machine learning for the development of artificial intelligence applications in manufacturing. Int J Comp Integ M. 2020; 33(5): 429–439. Publisher Full Text
13. Fan C, Zhang C, Yahja A, et al.: Disaster City Digital Twin: A vision for integrating artificial and human intelligence for disaster management. Int J Inform Manage. 2021; 56: 102049. Publisher Full Text
14. Rasheed A, San O, Kvamsdal T: Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2019; 1910,01719. Reference Source
15. Kousi N, Gkournelos C, Aivaliotis S, et al.: Digital twin for adaptation of robots’ behavior in flexible robotic assembly lines. Procedia manufacturing. 2019; 28: 121–126. Publisher Full Text
16. Liu Z, Meyendorf N, Mrad N: The role of data fusion in predictive maintenance using digital twin. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 2018; 1949(1): 020023. Publisher Full Text
17. Song EY, Burns M, Pandey A, et al.: IEEE 1451 smart sensor digital twin federation for IoT/CPS research. In 2019 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). 2019; 1–6. Publisher Full Text
18. Zhu J, Wu P: Towards Effective BIM/GIS Data Integration for Smart City by Integrating Computer Graphics Technique. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(10): 1889. Publisher Full Text
19. Ajjour Y, Wachsmuth H, Kiesel J, et al.: Data acquisition for argument search: The args. me corpus. In Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche Intelligenz). 2019; 48–59. Publisher Full Text
20. Kandris D, Nakas C, Vomvas D, et al.: Applications of wireless sensor networks: an up-to-date survey. Appl Syst Innov. 2020; 3(1): 14. Publisher Full Text
21. Dahlan AG, Muhammad Naim S, Luqman Zulhilmi AA: The Research of 3D Modeling between Visual & Creativity. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE). 2019; 8: 180–186.
22. Bandara M, Rabhi FA: Semantic modeling for engineering data analytics solutions. Semantic Web. 2020; 11(3): 525–547. Publisher Full Text
23. Wu Y, Lu Y: An intelligent machine vision system for detecting surface defects on packing boxes based on support vector machine. Meas Control. 2019; 52(7–8): 1102–1110. Publisher Full Text
24. Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S, Alamanos E: A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective. Technol Forecast Soc. 2019; 138: 139–154. Publisher Full Text
25. Gram-Hanssen K, Darby SJ: “Home is where the smart is”? Evaluating smart home research and approaches against the concept of home. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018; 37: 94–101. Publisher Full Text
26. Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R, et al.: Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. 2017 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom workshops). 2017; 618–623. Publisher Full Text
27. Phanden RK, Sharma P, Dubey A: A review on simulation in digital twin for aerospace, manufacturing and robotics. Mater Today: Proc. 2021; 38: 174–178. Publisher Full Text
28. Ibrion M, Paltrinieri N, Nejad AR: On risk of digital twin implementation in marine industry: Learning from aviation industry. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019; 1357(1): 012009. Publisher Full Text
29. Aydemir H, Zengin U, Durak U: The digital twin paradigm for aircraft review and outlook. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 2020; 0553. Publisher Full Text
30. Yurkevich EV, Stepanovskaya IA: Controlling the security of the airport airspace using the digital twin. J Phys: Conf Ser. IOP Publishing, 2021; 1864(1): 012128. Publisher Full Text
31. An J, Mikhaylov A, Kim K: Machine learning approach in heterogeneous group of algorithms for transport safety-critical system. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(8): 2670. Publisher Full Text
32. Tu Z, Fei F, Deng X: Untethered flight of an at-scale dual-motor hummingbird robot with bio-inspired decoupled wings. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020; 5(3): 4194–4201. Publisher Full Text
33. Dai X, Ke C, Quan Q, et al.: RFlySim: Automatic test platform for UAV autopilot systems with FPGA-based hardware-in-the-loop simulations. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2021; 114: 106727. Publisher Full Text
34. Singh KK, Frazier AE: A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications. Int J Remote Sens. 2018; 39(15–16): 5078–5098. Publisher Full Text
35. Zolanvari M, Jain R, Salman T: Potential data link candidates for civilian unmanned aircraft systems: A survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut. 2020; 22(1): 292–319. Publisher Full Text
36. Barr LC, Newman R, Ancel E, et al.: Preliminary risk assessment for small unmanned aircraft systems. 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. 2017; 3272. Publisher Full Text
37. Grigoropoulos N, Lalis S: Simulation and digital twin support for managed drone applications. 2020 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT). 2020; 1–8. Publisher Full Text
38. Reitenbach S, Vieweg M, Becker R, et al.: Collaborative Aircraft Engine Preliminary Design using a Virtual Engine Platform, Part A: Architecture and Methodology. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 2020; 0867. Publisher Full Text
39. Xiong M, Wang H, Fu Q, et al.: Digital twin–driven aero-engine intelligent predictive maintenance. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2021; 114: 3751–3761. Publisher Full Text
40. Van Waarde HJ, Eising J, Trentelman HL, et al.: Data informativity: a new perspective on data-driven analysis and control. IEEE T Automat Contr. 2020; 65(11): 4753–4768. Publisher Full Text
41. Le XH, Ho HV, Lee G, et al.: Application of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for flood forecasting. Water. 2019; 11(7): 1387. Publisher Full Text
42. Pogarskaia T, Churilova M, Petukhova M, et al.: Simulation and optimization of aircraft assembly process using supercomputer technologies. Russian Supercomputing Days. 2018; 965: 367–378. Publisher Full Text
43. Zaitseva N, Lupuleac S, Petukhova M, et al.: High performance computing for aircraft assembly optimization. In: 2018 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC). 2018; 1–6. Publisher Full Text
44. Qiuyue Z, Luling AN: Application of virtual reality and augment reality in aircraft assembly. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology. 2017; 530(11): 40–45.
45. Liang B, Liu W, Liu K, et al.: A displacement field perception method for component digital twin in aircraft assembly. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(18): 5161. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
46. Wagner R, Haefner B, Lanza G: Function-oriented quality control strategies for high precision products. Proc CIRP. 2018; 75: 57–62. Publisher Full Text
47. Sun X, Bao J, Li J, et al.: A digital twin-driven approach for the assembly-commissioning of high precision products. Robot Cim-Int Manuf. 2020; 61: 101839. Publisher Full Text
48. Cai H, Zhu J, Zhang W: Quality Deviation Control for Aircraft Using Digital Twin. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. 2021; 21(3): 031008. Publisher Full Text
49. Guo F, Liu J, Zou F, et al.: Aircraft Assembly Quality Control With Feedback Actions and Assembly Station Flowing Fluctuation Analysis. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 190118–190135. Publisher Full Text
50. Lv C, Cao D, Zhao Y, et al.: Analysis of autopilot disengagements occurring during autonomous vehicle testing. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. 2017; 5(1): 58–68. Publisher Full Text
51. Dikmen M, Burns C: Trust in autonomous vehicles: The case of Tesla Autopilot and Summon. In: IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern. 2017; 1093–1098. Publisher Full Text
52. James A, Krestinskaya O, Maan A: Recursive Threshold Logic-A Bioinspired Reconfigurable Dynamic Logic System With Crossbar Arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2020; 14(6): 1311–1322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
53. Dennis AR, Minas RK: Security on autopilot: Why current security theories hijack our thinking and lead us astray. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 2018; 49(SI): 15–38. Publisher Full Text
54. Larini G, Romano G, Falcitelli M, et al.: Autonomous Driving Progressed by oneM2M : The Experience of the AUTOPILOT Project. In: 2019 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC). 2019; 204–208. Publisher Full Text
55. Almeaibed S, Al-Rubaye S, Tsourdos A, et al.: Digital Twin Analysis to Promote Safety and Security in Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine. 2021; 5(1): 40–46. Publisher Full Text
56. Yun H, Park D: Simulation of Self-driving System by implementing Digital Twin with GTA5. In: 2021 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC). 2021; 1–2. Publisher Full Text
57. Khan M, Chakraborty S, Astya R, et al.: Face Detection and Recognition Using OpenCV. In: 2019 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS). 2019; 116–119. Publisher Full Text
58. Valeja Y, Pathare S, Patel D, et al.: Traffic Sign Detection using Clara and Yolo in Python. In: 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS). 2021; 1: 367–371. Publisher Full Text
59. Kumar N, Rathee M, Chandran N, et al.: Cryptflow: Secure tensorflow inference. In: IEEE Symp Secur Priv. 2020; 336–353. Publisher Full Text
60. Zhou G, Zhang C, Li Z, et al.: Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. Int J Prod Res. 2020; 58(4): 1034–1051. Publisher Full Text
61. Li L, Qu T, Liu Y, et al.: Sustainability Assessment of Intelligent Manufacturing Supported by Digital Twin. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 174988–175008. Publisher Full Text
62. Zhang C, Ji W: Digital twin-driven carbon emission prediction and low-carbon control of intelligent manufacturing job-shop. Procedia CIRP. 2019; 83: 624–629. Publisher Full Text
63. Zhao H, Liu J, Xiong H, et al.: 3D visualization real-time monitoring method for digital twin workshop. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 2019; 25(06): 1432–1443.
64. Wu P, Qi M, Gao L, et al.: Research on the Virtual Reality Synchronization of Workshop Digital Twin. In: 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Conference on information technology and artificial intelligence (itaic). 2019; 875–879. Publisher Full Text
65. Fang Y, Peng C, Lou P, et al.: Digital-Twin-Based Job Shop Scheduling Toward Smart Manufacturing. IEEE Trans Industr Inform. 2019; 15(12): 6425–6435. Publisher Full Text
66. Gao X, Cai J: Optimization analysis of urban function regional planning based on big data and GIS technology. Technical Bulletin. 2017; 55(11): 344–351. Reference Source
67. Zhu L, Yu FR, Wang Y, et al.: Big data analytics in intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE trans Intell Transp Syst. 2018; 20(1): 383–398. Publisher Full Text
68. Veres M, Moussa M: Deep learning for intelligent transportation systems: A survey of emerging trends. IEEE trans Intell Transp Syst. 2019; 21(8): 3152–3168. Publisher Full Text
69. Mavromatis I, Piechocki RJ, Sooriyabandara M, et al.: Drive: digital network Oracle for collaborative intelligent transportation systems. Proc IEEE Symp Comput Commun. 2020; 1–7. Publisher Full Text
70. Bhatti G, Mohan H, Singh RR: Towards the future of smart electric vehicles: Digital twin technology. Renewable and sustainable energy review. 2021; 141: 110801. Publisher Full Text
71. Rudskoy A, Ilin I, Prokhorov A: Digital Twins in the Intelligent Transport Systems. Transportation Research Procedia. 2021; 54: 927–935. Publisher Full Text
72. El Marai O, Taleb T, Song J: Roads Infrastructure Digital Twin: A Step Toward Smarter Cities Realization. IEEE Network. 2021; 35(2): 136–143. Publisher Full Text
73. Liu Y, Wang Z, Han K, et al.: Sensor fusion of camera and cloud digital twin information for intelligent vehicles. In: 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). 2020; 182–187. Publisher Full Text
74. Saifutdinov F, Jackson, I, Tolujevs J, et al.: Digital Twin as a Decision Support Tool for Airport Traffic Control. In 2020 61st International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Management Science of Riga Technical University (ITMS). 2020; (1-5). Reference Source
75. ÜZÜMCÜ S, MERT AA, ATAY F: Usage of Digital Twin Technologies during System Modeling and Testing in Vessel Traffic Services System Project. In INCOSE International Symposium. 2019; 29(1): 189–202. Publisher Full Text
76. Wang S, Zhang F, Qin T: Research on the Construction of Highway Traffic Digital Twin System Based on 3D GIS Technology. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021; 1802(4): 042–045. Publisher Full Text
77. Shahat E, Hyun CT, Yeom C: City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6): 3386. Publisher Full Text
78. Steyn WJ, Broekman A: Process for the Development of a Digital Twin of a Local Road–A Case Study. In: In Civil Infrastructures Confronting Severe Weathers and Climate Changes Conference. 2021; 11–22. Reference Source
79. Brunner P, Denk F, Huber W, et al.: Virtual safety performance assessment for automated driving in complex urban traffic scenarios. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). 2019; 679–685. Reference Source
80. Gao X, Cai J, Long Y, et al.: Study on traffic organization for primary roads with super small spacing. Advances in Transportation Studies. 2017; 2. Reference Source
81. Wan Z, Dong Y, Yu Z, et al.: Semi-Supervised Support Vector Machine for Digital Twins Based Brain Image Fusion. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15: 705323. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
82. Lv Z, Chen D, Feng H, et al.: Beyond 5G for Digital Twins of UAVs. Computer Networks. 2021; 197: 108366. Publisher Full Text
83. Tao F, Qi Q: Make more digital twins. Nature. 2019; 573(7775): 490–491. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text